![]() variations in an individual’s scores over time can and usually do reflect mood improvement or worsening.no self-report questionnaire can be used for diagnostic purposes or as an exact guide to an individual’s level of depression or anxiety.However, as is true with all depression self-report measures, scores can vary from individual to individual. For example, scores in the mid-teens on the MOM-D probably indicate mild depression, scores above 20 moderate depression, scores above 30 may indicate more serious depression. Thus, since the Mind Over Mood inventories have a similar number of items as the Beck inventories, I usually informally advise clinicians that they can use the Beck scoring guides as a rough approximation for our inventories. Scores on the MOM-D and MOM-A are highly correlated with scores on these inventories. However, research studies (see links below) have examined the concurrent validity of our scales with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories ( which have been widely used in research) as well as the Burns Depression Checklist and Anxiety Inventory. To my knowledge, no one has conducted the large scale studies required to determine their testing properties. To provide cut-off scores on the inventories related to likely depression or anxiety severity, we would need data on several thousand people. They are not used to classify depression or anxiety severity. The Mind Over Mood inventories are more appropriate to use for self-monitoring and to compare client scores over time and document progress in therapy. We do not have established norms for our Mind Over Mood Depression Inventory (MOM-D) or Mind Over Mood Anxiety Inventory (MOM-A). Further clinical implications of the BAI based on these results and some limitations of the study are discussed.Īnxiety beck anxiety inventory diagnostic utility evidence-based assessment psychometric property.Clinicians frequently write and ask if we have established norms for the Mood Inventories in the Mind Over Mood book. Our data supports the BAI reliability and validity as a tool to measure the severity of general anxiety in clinical and non-clinical populations however, it fails to capture the unique characteristics of anxiety disorders that distinguish them from depressive disorders. However, BAI mean score was not higher for the anxiety-only group than the depression-only group. The comparison of BAI and BDI mean scores for different diagnostic groups revealed that BAI and BDI scores were higher in the depressive or anxiety disorders group than in the non-clinical group. The ROC analysis failed to provide cutoff scores with adequate sensitivity and specificity for identifying participants with anxiety disorders (85.0% sensitivity, 88.1% specificity, and 92.8% AUC). ![]() The BAI was found to have high correlations with depression-related self-report measures (0.747-0.796) and moderate to high correlations with anxiety-related self-report measures (0.518-0.776). ROC analysis and calculation of positive and negative predictive values were conducted to examine diagnostic utility. A total of 1,157 participants were involved in the final psychometric analysis, which included correlational analysis with other anxiety and depression self-report measures and mean score comparison with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). This study aims to clarify the clinical utility of the BAI as a screening tool for anxiety disorders according to DSM-IV criteria, based on blind recruitment and diagnostic interviews of both clinical and non-clinical participants in the Korean population. Despite the prominent use of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) in primary healthcare systems, few studies have confirmed its diagnostic utility and psychometric properties in non-Western countries. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |